Welcome to Hastings Moot Court, the #2 Moot Court team in the United States!  You can support our team by signing up to judge a practice or by making a donation to Hastings Moot Court.  To make a donation, please visit the Contributions page.  To sign up to judge a practice, check out the upcoming practices below and click on any of the "Sign Up" buttons.

When you sign up to judge a team practice, a student coach will send you all of the materials you need to get up to speed on the relevant law and arguments both sides will be making.  The student coach will also let you know of any relevant information, such as time or location changes.  If you have any questions about a specific practice time, please email the student coach.  Their contact information should be on the individual team's webpage.  You can get to an individual team's webpage by clicking their name.  When you arrive at a practice, please introduce yourself to the student coach and the competitors.  The team members are always excited to see new and old faces.
 

Upcoming Practices

DATE AND TIME TEAM ROOM JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE JUDGE
Fri. April 3
5:30PM - 7:00PM Giles S. Rich Teams Kimberly Macey Mikayla O'Neal cecilia grimaldi Justine Jung Shannon Gillespie McComb
Mon. April 6
7:00PM - 8:30PM Giles S. Rich Teams Rachel Winer Kimberly Macey Stephanie Richardson Shannon Gillespie McComb Charles Tait Graves
Tue. April 7
10:00AM - 12:00PM Giles S. Rich Teams Rachel Winer Stephanie Richardson
Thu. April 9
3:30PM - 5:30PM Giles S. Rich Teams Kimberly Macey Tina Nguyen Geoff Fitzpatrick
Fri. April 10
5:30PM - 7:00PM Giles S. Rich Teams Kimberly Macey Rachel Winer Geoffrey Fitzpatrick

See all 8 upcoming practices

Teams

Natalie Ryang and Han (Lu) Ling

Hal is a sentient AI program created by Dr. Schrodinger. Pet Accessories, Inc. (PA) hired Hal to help develop pet accessories. Hal invented an automated pet food dispenser, and PA applied for a patent on the invention. The application listed Dr. Schrodinger as the inventor, not Hal. The patent was granted.

PA sued Purr-fect Technologies, Inc. (PTI) for patent infringement. PTI argued that PA's patent was invalid for improper inventorship because neither Dr. Schrodinger nor Hal can be listed as an inventor on the patent. PTI also argued that the patent's claim includes a means-plus-function limitation under 35 USC 112(f) and that the limitation is indefinite under 112(b) because no structure is disclosed in the patent's specification that corresponds to the limitation.

The district court found for PTI on both issues. PA now appeals. The two issues on appeal to the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit are:

1. Whether claim 1 of the '399 patent is invalid as indefinite under 35 USC 112(b).

2. Whether the '399 patent is invalid for incorrect inventorship.

Last practice April 14.

View schedule

Contact team scheduling contacts for questions or changes in judging practices.
Contact Iain Cunningham at iain@hastingsmootcourt.com for questions or comments about this web page.