Welcome to Hastings Moot Court! Please support our team by signing up to judge a practice argument!
Spring 2018 Competition Teams will start having practices January 2018.
|DATE AND TIME||TEAM||ROOM||JUDGE||JUDGE||JUDGE||JUDGE||JUDGE|
|Thu. January 18|
|8:30AM - 9:30AM||Lefkowitz - Respodent||Room F||Jordan Olson||Pres-Elect Harold Saxon|
|12:00PM - 1:00PM||Lefkowitz - Petitioner||Room E||Maddy LS||Brittany||Fiona||Adrienne Subido||Miranda Rowley|
|1:00PM - 2:00PM||3L Nationals||Tower 404||Fiona||Michael Raimondi||Nicole Wise||Carson Riley|
|2:00PM - 3:00PM||3L Nationals||Tower 404||Gabbi||Madeline Landry||Sarah Madan||Carson Riley|
|6:00PM - 8:00PM||Tulane||C|
Naomi Strauss, Jonathan Klaren, and John Darin
Petitioners are appealing the 14th Circuit Court of Appeals’ decision to reverse the trial court’s judgments as matter of law in favor of the government. Petitioners are instead asking the United States Supreme Court to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals and hold that: 1) § 1983 claims of retaliatory arrest require plaintiffs to plead the absence of probable cause; and 2) unauthorized drivers of rental cars are third parties who lack standing to challenge vehicle searches.
The Certified Questions are as follows:
Last practice January 23.
Francesca Reifer, Eric Schmoll, and Alex Andorfer
The first issue is about whether an NHL player's claims under a Minnesota state law—challenging his suspension under a collectively bargained for drug policy—are preempted by federal law (LMRA). The second focuses on whether an arbitration award sanctioning the NHL for its refusal to issue specific product warnings regarding banned substances should be set aside as a violation of public policy.
Last practice February 4.
Noura Elfarra, Sonya Patel, Matthew Tratos
Hollywood Hops, a Southern California organic brewery founded by former child star Dustin Diamond, appeals a lower court decision denying an injunction on trademark grounds of use of the name Hollywood & Vine by a Southern California winery.
The issues are these:
1) Whether Hollywood Hops is distinctive enough to qualify as a trademark;
2) Whether Mr. Diaomond acquiesced to Hollywood & Vine's use of the name, thereby providing Hollywood & Vine with an affirmative defense; and whether consumers are likely to confuse (likelihood of confusion) the names of the two companies.
Last practice February 9.
Monika Darwish, Eisha Perry, Swetha Gopalakrishnan
Hollywood Hops, a Southern Utopia organic brewery founded by former child star Dustin Diamond, appeals a lower court decision denying an injunction on trademark grounds of use of the name Hollywood & Vine by a Southern California winery.
The issues are these:
1) Whether Hollywood Hops is distinctive enough to qualify as a trademark and whether consumers are likely to confuse (likelihood of confusion) the names of the two companies.
2) Whether Mr. Diamond acquiesced to Hollywood & Vine's use of the name, thereby providing Hollywood & Vine with an affirmative defense.
Last practice February 7.
Catherine Kennedy and Andrea Swanson
Petitioner Millicent Pepper, a native and citizen of the Coco Republic who was admitted to the United States on an F-1 student visa, appeals the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourteenth Circuit holding that Petitioner was lawfully subjected to administrative removal proceedings having committed an aggravated felony under the Immigration and Nationality Act ("INA").
On certiorari, the parties are directed argue the following questions:
(1) Whether a federal appellate court has jurisdiction over a petition for review of a final order of removal when the basis for removal is an alien's conviction of an aggravated felony and the alien did not raise a challenge to such basis for removal during her administrative removal proceedings.
(2) Whether a conviction for criminal sale of marijuana in the third degree per E.V.P.L. section 331.45 categorically fits the definition of "aggravated felony" under the Controlled Substances Act.
Last practice January 30.
Carson Riley, Tanya Sanderson, Rachel Steyer, Nolan Theurer & Tammy Su
1. Whether the arbitral award of 2 March 2017 is valid;
2. Whether there was a violation of Article 6 of the FCN Treaty when the Egart operated in Anduchenca's territorial sea, and whether Adduchenca violated Article 7 of the FCN Treaty when it caputred the Egart;
3. Whether Anduchenca violated Article 16 of the Treaty of Friendship, Commerce and Navigation by commissioning and operating the Ibra;
4. Whether Rukaruku violated Article 17 of the Treaty of Friendship, Commerce and Navigation when it attacked the Covfefe and captured the Ibra.
Last practice February 20.